Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
up till now the reporters were all on record saying they did NOT tell Libby.

Cooper says and testified that he brought it up to Libby.

And IMO, even if all of the reporters knew of Plame independently from discussions with Libby, the indcitment still stands. That's my recollection, having read the indictment with exactly that fact pattern (reporters knew before Libby did) in mind.

225 posted on 11/16/2005 6:00:37 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
And IMO, even if all of the reporters knew of Plame independently from discussions with Libby, the indcitment still stands.

The Indictment and Fitzgeralds statements alleged that Libby could NOT have learned of Plame from reporters because no reporters knew of Plame before Libby leaked the name. The idea that Plame was not widely known is becoming a joke.

255 posted on 11/16/2005 7:08:04 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson