To: RWR8189
Lindsey Graham may have stood up to this amendment, but he is trying to get access to the appeals courts for the terrorists. Spineless POS.
3 posted on
11/15/2005 5:32:48 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Peach
Kristol is pleased with McCain's vote.
5 posted on
11/15/2005 5:34:25 PM PST by
onyx
((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: Peach
Lindsey Graham may have stood up to this amendment, but he is trying to get access to the appeals courts for the terrorists. What would their access (to civilian courts) be without Senate action?
14 posted on
11/15/2005 5:40:43 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: Peach
Lindsey Graham may have stood up to this amendment, but he is trying to get access to the appeals courts for the terrorists. I don't think that's the case.
Instead, didn't Graham sponsor a bill that would eliminate the appeals of detainees declared to be "illegal combatants"?
30 posted on
11/15/2005 5:53:26 PM PST by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Peach
What's going on? Bill Kristol is finally writing as a true conservative and the GOP Senators minus RINOS have sold us down the river? Did I wake up in a parallel universe this morning?
To: Peach
Lindsey Graham may have stood up to this amendment, but he is trying to get access to the appeals courts for the terrorists. Spineless POS.
Maybe he plans to get back into the lawyering business and is trying to line up some future clients.........saudi terrorists with deep pockets!
46 posted on
11/15/2005 6:04:37 PM PST by
Kokojmudd
(Outsource the 9th Circuit Court to Walmart for better customer service!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson