Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68

Good Summary. I have been following this story as well.

FWIW, I think that much of this involved a lack of understanding of how the government systems and computers worked. I can't say for certain, but I believe that much of the feeling that the monies were poorly accounted for was, at least partly, a lack of understanding of the same.


24 posted on 11/15/2005 3:32:11 PM PST by Bush 100 Percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Bush 100 Percent
FWIW, I think that much of this involved a lack of understanding of how the government systems and computers worked

Thanks. Partly it was, but was essentially an attempt at the greatest scam ever perpetrated. The only true sample taken was of all of the Plaintiffs' leases and went all the way back to 1909. The sample found only $67 of incorrectly applied funds. From that, and because records going back to 1872 were pretty incomplete, the plaintiffs now want $176 billion. Lamberth has never asked the plaintiffs for one iota of evidence to support such a demand. What he has permitted is the plaintiffs demand that "if you can't prove you don't owe it to us, then by default, you do." The Department has tried every conceivable way to work with plaintiffs, but with the judge on their side, to no avail.

27 posted on 11/15/2005 4:17:24 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson