Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Indian Money Accounting Impossible
AP ^ | 11/15/5 | JENNIFER TALHELM

Posted on 11/15/2005 12:59:45 PM PST by SmithL

WASHINGTON -- A federal appeals court decided Tuesday that it was unreasonable to require a historical accounting of money the government has been managing for Indian tribes, saying the bookkeeping chore would "take 200 years."

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia sided with the government and the tribes in their effort to block a lower court order for a detailed tally of money owed the tribes going back to 1887.

The accounting had been ordered by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, who is overseeing a class-action lawsuit in which thousands of Indians claim they were cheated out of more than $100 billion in oil, gas, grazing, timber and other royalties overseen by the Interior Department.

In their appeals, the government and the Indians argued that the massive historical accounting Lamberth ordered would cost up to $13 billion — far more than was reasonable.

On Tuesday, a three judge appeals panel agreed, overturning the accounting and calling Lamberth's decision "ill-founded," an abuse of discretion and was not favored by either side in the lawsuit.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: howconvenient; indianaffairs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
It may not be justice, but it is real-world.

Lambeth is probably one of the good guys, but this entire case has been as badly mismanaged as the Indian's money has been.

1 posted on 11/15/2005 12:59:45 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Government accounting = Enron accounting - except, of course, government employees will never go to jail over it...
2 posted on 11/15/2005 1:03:58 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Typical of all government run programs.

Glad I don't bank with the government!

I can just imagine, "Sir, we don't know exacly how much you have, it's complicated. Have a pen."

3 posted on 11/15/2005 1:05:13 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
It may not be justice, but it is real-world.

I believe it is justice. Lamberth has continually sided with this attempted scam of the American taxpayers. He has ordered computer shutdowns at the behest of the plaintiffs which have stopped payments to the very Indians at the core of this case. He has refused to consider every attempt to work with the plaintiffs by the Department of Interior. He has placed absurd requirements for record keeping on the defendants, and totally ignored any effort to actually estimate a total amount possibly owed to the plaintiffs.

He may be one of the good guys, but for years he has been acting as an advocate, not a judge. Good for the appeals court!

4 posted on 11/15/2005 1:11:01 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

bffr


5 posted on 11/15/2005 1:13:36 PM PST by kenth (Come back here... so that I may brain thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Perhaps we should sue for an accounting of our income tax money......


6 posted on 11/15/2005 1:13:38 PM PST by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

There was a time there, you couldn't book reservations at Yellowstone online because the Park Service was a part of the Dept. of the Interior, which included the BIA, and all of their computer stuff was ordered off line for security reasons, less someone mess with the BIA funds. And this included Wildland fire information sites, BLM sites, and other things that just made it expensive to get anything done.


7 posted on 11/15/2005 1:18:04 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
There was a time there, you couldn't book reservations at Yellowstone online because the Park Service was a part of the Dept. of the Interior, which included the BIA, and all of their computer stuff was ordered off line for security reasons, less someone mess with the BIA funds

Very true. The problem is that most of the computer systems in the Department are tied in a number of ways. And almost all of the financial aspects are handled over a secure internet connection. So Lamberth wanted a computer system with absolutely no internet connection. That ended all payments to the Indians because the internet was required to receive reports in order to calculate amounts owed. This then snowballed to almost every part of Interior, including the Park Service. He did this three times, the first one was about 3 months long.

8 posted on 11/15/2005 1:28:59 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

He's a great example of judicial overstepping...he meant well all along, but the cure was worse than the disease!


9 posted on 11/15/2005 1:38:23 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"By right of conquest".


10 posted on 11/15/2005 1:39:45 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Glad I'm not an Indian. also glad the Department of the Interior has no strings on me.


11 posted on 11/15/2005 1:40:29 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Lamberth is a self-important jackass.


12 posted on 11/15/2005 1:40:39 PM PST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
If this decision is upheld, Lamberth will have succeeded in causing the waste of $100 million tilting at an audit that could never be completed and various experts had so testified many times.
13 posted on 11/15/2005 2:06:55 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Just imagine making this sort of claim when the IRS audits you.


14 posted on 11/15/2005 2:09:16 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Wasn't this when Bennett, under the Clinton Administration, was involved?


15 posted on 11/15/2005 2:15:38 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Lambeth is probably one of the good guys,

Federal Judge Royce Lamberth is best known for the ease with which he approved dozens of discovery motions that allowed fellow conservative Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch to dig into the public and private life of President Bill Clinton - Brief Article

He sure is.
How come Dubya didn't appoint him to the SCOTUS?

16 posted on 11/15/2005 2:22:19 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

I can't beleive everyone has such a dim view of Lamberth. He was seen as a conservative hero in the late 90's.


17 posted on 11/15/2005 2:24:21 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

When a judge's finding is characterized as "abuse of discretion" it is a statement that basically no reasonable person would agree with him! I haven't followed this case but that is a real smackdown.


18 posted on 11/15/2005 2:26:37 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I can't beleive everyone has such a dim view of Lamberth. He was seen as a conservative hero in the late 90's.

Anybody who sided with Larry Klayman as much as Lamberth did has got to have a couple of screws loose.

The fact that an Appeals Court said he "abused his discretion" is quite a reprimand.

19 posted on 11/15/2005 2:30:41 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I can't beleive everyone has such a dim view of Lamberth. He was seen as a conservative hero in the late 90's.

I have observed Lamberth throughout the Cobell litigation and saw clear and convincing abuses of judicial power by him. His dislike of Clinton resulted in decisions conservatives saw as beneficial to the cause, but Lamberth is no hero, and deserves to be sanctioned for his atrocious behavior.

20 posted on 11/15/2005 2:46:05 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson