Nope. I am going to stay. I will see freedom win, and enjoy watching liars who call themselves "conservatives" choke on their own hateful venomous bile as hispanics see the american dream take place with a salsa flavor. We will have to get our out of control border under control, for certain. But no one except a small group of spiteful, bitter, vengeful fauxconservatives believes that the ONLY way to get control of the border is to build a fence and expel everyone not here legally. It is NOT the only way, and it is not the smartest way, and it is not the most painless way..., hell, it ain't even a GOOD way. Even those who don't buy a market approach (aka ...., "more" open borders vs "less" open borders and "controlled" amnesty vs "unlimited" amnesty) to the problem don't advocate the kind of draconian "PUNISH THE BUSINESS OWNER" gestapo tactics some of you people advocate. If you could see thru your own anger for half a second you would know that true conservatives believe in freedom and want to see the benefits of freedom expanded to all who can reasonably benefit. Police action to fix a problem needs to be weighed ALWAYS against the potential infringements on freedom, and you have NO idea what you are asking for. Faux conservatives continually rant as though there was only one of two choices: Slam the door shut and expel all foreigners or simply allow the border to be a sieve with no oversight. And..., it really doesn't matter if you restrain from pointing out the sneering condescension and slurs or just say "screw it, I am going to call em like I see em, some of you people are just haters." Either way gets the same apoplectic gush of name calling, groundless accusations, fatuous objections, and just plain lies.
It IS descipable when people place their neighbors in danger (as it is UNSAFE for 10 people to live in a 2 bedroom house) by fire hazards, etc... all to send money to another economy that doesn't care about ours at all.
If I want to invite my whole extended family of 30 people to live with me to save money and send every dime I have to Bangkok, it is, simply, none of your damn business. I once had a client who owned chinese restaurants. She owned a home and she had BUNK BEDS in the living room and in her room and the second bedroom. Her extended family lived there and they operated 3 restaurants. They sacrificed personal comfort and in 8 years all of them bought (almost all in cash) three VERY nice homes in exclusive subdivisions. They were willing to sacrifice for a goal they had. You, obviously, think it "unsafe" to do so, although there are no stated covenant restrictions in this particular neighborhood to the number of persons per dwelling. If you think it is "unsafe" then there is no need to get the fed involved. Check the zoning restrictions/covenants, and if there is a violation, demand that the local authorities enforce the zoning/housing restrictions, or get the local homeowners to enact covenants and then file suit against the homeowner for violation (you may have a case for depressing property values if there are restrictive covenants and the place is a dorm.... I know of local citizens in Atlanta who got rid of a crackhouse that way). Me? I think the idea of being "unsafe" in a 2 bedroom house is just a sour dyspeptic complaint that some people will sacrifice when it might be inconvenient, especially if they already have a hobby horse they are riding.
I wasn't talking about getting out of America, I was talking about getting out of Free Republic.