too bad they screwed up roe v wade as well.
Is citing a bad supreme court decision by liberal activists something you want to base your position on, or do you want to work to change it back to the ORIGINAL interpretation?
Of course not. My point is that in order to make such a change, you will have to go through the constitutional process. I don't want SCOTUS deciding.
Some other info on the definition of natural born citizens. It has some current relevancy since John McCain was born in Panama.
The U.S. Supreme Court's reasoning in United States v. Won Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) (which held that a person born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. but to noncitizens is thereby automatically a citizen) has been viewed by some legal scholars as indicating that a person born abroad, even to parents of U.S. citizens, does not constitue a "natural born" citizen.
Likewise, Weedin v. Chin Bow, 274 U.S. 657, 663 (1927) recites that "under the common law which applied in his country, the children of citizens born abroad were not citizens but were aliens." But no Supreme Court case has yet squarely addressed what "natural born Citizen" means in the context of Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.