Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat

Sounds like they're attempting to exercise "states' rights."


4 posted on 11/15/2005 6:24:45 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chi-townChief

These boobs could exercise a poodle.


6 posted on 11/15/2005 6:29:35 AM PST by RexBeach ("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief
Sounds like they're attempting to exercise "states' rights."

I think you're right. When big government was promoting the liberal/left agenda, it was ok. Now that big government is not so friendly to the left, some of them seem to be having second thoughts.

12 posted on 11/15/2005 6:34:26 AM PST by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

They can talk about it all they want, but they can't seceed, regardless of their rhetoric.

Read the following:

The five to three decision, read on April 15, 1869, by Chief Justice S. P. Chase, held the Union to be indestructable and, thus, not dissoluble by any act of a state, the government, or the people. The court, therefore, repudiated the doctrine of state sovereignty, but it clearly supported the federal in contradistinction to a consolidated system of government, for the decision continues: "But the perpetuity and indissolubility of the Union, by no means, implies the loss of distinct and individual existence or of the right of self-government by the states."

And

Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1869) was a significant case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1869. The Court held (in a 5–3 decision) that Texas had remained a state of the United States ever since it first joined the Union, despite its joining the Confederate States of America and its being under military rule at the time of the decision in the case. It further held that the Constitution did not permit states to secede from the United States, and that the ordinances of secession, and all the acts of the legislatures within seceding states intended to give effect to such ordinances, were "absolutely null".


37 posted on 11/15/2005 7:20:11 AM PST by DaiHuy (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson