To: billbears
Haven't seen that. Do you have several valid sources other than Weakly Standard, World Nut Daily, or National Review? Google this string: "500 tons" IAEA.
Here are a couple of hits from that search:
- www.iaea.org (a pdf)
- news.bbc.co.uk
There are lots more. But, admittedly, Google, the IAEA, the BBC, and
Science could well be in on the same dastardly conspiracy being promulgated by National Review and The Weekly Standard.
(steely)
65 posted on
11/15/2005 10:40:27 AM PST by
Steely Tom
(Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
To: Steely Tom
A couple of issues here. The Tuwaitha site was known before the police action and the material had been listed. Not a WMD but a known and noted asset. Secondly, the issue of the article was not that the material was there (which was known) but that it went missing when the Iraqis left it unattended. Which surely couldn't happen as the war drummers have told us all WMDs went to Syria isn't it?
66 posted on
11/15/2005 10:48:09 AM PST by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: Steely Tom
Bump
Here are a couple of hits from that search:
www.iaea.org (a pdf)
news.bbc.co.uk
There are lots more. But, admittedly, Google, the IAEA, the BBC, and Science could well be in on the same dastardly conspiracy being promulgated by National Review and The Weekly Standard.
127 posted on
12/04/2013 1:14:31 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson