Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativecorner
Ah, neocon Norm and the Weakly Standard. Surely you have a reliable source other than two that practically beat the war drums themselves don't you?

look there was plenty of evidence that Saddam had nuclear weapons, by the way. That is not in dispute.

Okay, Carl gives us his opinion. Just because it's coming from a Democrat doesn't validate the Bush argument. They were both wrong

63 posted on 11/15/2005 10:25:11 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
Okay, Carl gives us his opinion. Just because it's coming from a Democrat doesn't validate the Bush argument. They were both wrong

That is the point. Being WRONG is not "lying."
70 posted on 11/15/2005 11:07:16 AM PST by Conservatish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: billbears

Check your facts much more carefully. It was not Bush's argument. It was actually Clinton's, Bush was just parroting it. As was every other intelligence agnecy in the world, even the Inspectors themselves stated with conviction that Saddam had WMD's.


95 posted on 11/15/2005 6:30:33 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson