Replies

You, my friend, truly need to be zotted from this website. You just keep repeating the same old lame liberal arguments straight from the DNC talking points over and over again. Many here have given you link after bloody link to counter your arguments and like a mind numb robot, you keep repeating the same disinformation presented by the leftists in this country to undermine our military and our country.
WHY do you keep saying 'POLICE ACTION' over and over again in this conversation about the War in Iraq? US military action was approved of by the majority of the US CONGRESS! That can hardly be 'police action' on any scale.

THE UNITED STATES MILITARY can not be compared to 'police action' on any scale other than in some leftist moonbats mind. Go away..I am tired of playing with your stupidity.

(Administrator, please review this person's posts, his intentions on Free Republic are suspect, imho.)

Here boys and girls, these ISSA research articles offer the best explaination I have seen of what probably happened to Iraq's WMD programs;

Iraqi WMD and Delivery Development Being Undertaken in Libya

Iraqi WMD Debate and Intelligence: the links to Libya

Posts 80-85

I think Iraq, Libya, Iran, are playing games with us. Consider the logical pobability Iraq did move it's WMD programs to Libya. We know Libya rolled and supposedly gave up their WMDs, but look, who is close to a nuke now, Iran!! Do you suppose any of the Iraq/Libya WMD programs could have ended up in Iran before Libya rolled?

Libya giving up it's WMDs might have been a ploy to cover the movement of WMD programs to Iran.

We'll probably never know the truth.

You, my friend, truly need to be zotted from this website. You just keep repeating the same old lame liberal arguments straight from the DNC talking points over and over again

Tell you what. Why don't you review my posts over the past five years. Please point to one post where I have deviated from the Constitution and my love for said document. I hold the Framers, the document they wrote, and their intentions with relation to foreign policy (as outlined by men like Washington, Madison, and Jefferson) over any party or any partisanship. I'm about to the point I could care less who is in office. Neither party gives a damn about the document anyway. And if you say they do, you're only fooling yourself.

Many here have given you link after bloody link to counter your arguments and like a mind numb robot, you keep repeating the same disinformation presented by the leftists in this country to undermine our military and our country.

Lady, I'm as far right as you can get and still be on the map. I do not pander to Republican mantras or Democratic mantras. I definitely do not bother with johnny come latelys to the conservative movement men who write for the National Review or Weekly Standard. Bill Buckley himself has recanted some of his views on Iraq. Why don't you complain about him? Yet under latest management I wouldn't use the NR to cover the bottom of a bird cage.

By definition of the US Constitution this was a police action as every military action has been since the last Declaration of War in 1941. Unless you'll tell us next the Gulf of Tonkin resolution was a declaration of war as well? Or that Vietnam was a war? Because it wasn't. It was an extended police action, the same as this

Go away..I am tired of playing with your stupidity.

LOL, you haven't addressed any of the concerns raised by many on the right. All you've done is provide links to magazines that parrot administration talking points. Contrary to those that worship Bush, he is not the conservative movement nor does he much represent it.

WHY do you keep saying 'POLICE ACTION' over and over again in this conversation about the War in Iraq? US military action was approved of by the majority of the US CONGRESS! That can hardly be 'police action' on any scale.

It is a police action. There is no war in the formal sense unless Congress specifically passes a declaration of war, something we haven't done since WW II (December 7, 1941 after the Pearl Harbor attack).

As far as your demand that billbears be banned, it's pretty strange coming from someone who has so few facts straight and keeps changing them every couple of posts.

Personally, I would prefer that we return to formal declarations of war. We'd have less pussyfooting and backtracking by the Dims if we had forced a declaration of war against Iraq. Having gone with a presidential police action, it leaves the Dim a backdoor to criticize it now and it tied the hands of Bush and the military in how they prosecuted this police action. Beyond that, the Founders did specify that this is how the Republic was to conduct warfare and the Constitution is still important, however badly it has suffered in the hands of liberal wackos in robes.