I don't doubt for a moment that people like Rockefeller were traipsing over to Baghdad and Damascus saying, in one way or another, "whatever you guys do here, make sure there are no WMDs lying around Iraq for Bush to find" (though we did find some in a few scattered spots) - I think Rockefeller and McDermott etc. were in at least tacit if not open collusion to make sure Saddam pretended to clean up his act - either they would avert the war or else they would end up having a useful cause celebre against the Bush administration. Is Rockefeller capable of such treason? Without a doubt...... his methods and outlook were spelled out in the covert memo from his staff that leaked out about using the Senate Intelligence Committee to assault the Bush WH.
This is why we were delayed for over a year going through the UN by the collaborators in the Democrat Party...Collaborating with Saddam against Bush.
They had almost two years to move their WMD's to Iran and Syria, or bury them in the desert.
I don't understand why we concede the point that there were no WMD's...Saddam had 500 tons of Uranium. How do they get away with saying there was no evidence that he was pursuing nukes?