To: prairiebreeze; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; EllaMinnow; ...
3 posted on
11/14/2005 4:32:44 PM PST by
Mo1
To: Mo1
This paragraph is a thing of beauty:
Let us suppose, then, that we can find a senator who voted for the 1998 act to remove Saddam Hussein yet did not anticipate that it might entail the use of force, and who later voted for the 2002 resolution and did not appreciate that the authorization of force would entail the removal of Saddam Hussein! Would this senator kindly stand up and take a bow? He or she embodies all the moral and intellectual force of the anti-war movement. And don't be bashful, ladies and gentlemen of the "shocked, shocked" faction, we already know who you are.
13 posted on
11/14/2005 5:06:01 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Mo1
Thanks for the ping; very interesting article.
To: Mo1
We did not know and could not know, until after the invasion, of Saddam's plan to buy long-range missiles off the shelf from Pyongyang, or of the centrifuge components buried on the property of his chief scientist, Dr. Mahdi Obeidi. The Duelfer report disclosed large latent facilities that were only waiting for the collapse of sanctions to resume activity. Nothing of what was found (and I still believe most of it was moved or buried) was ever acknowleged by our lying media. Nothing.
18 posted on
11/15/2005 5:09:58 AM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson