[phoenix4]

The only thing wrong with this report is that there were no wmd in Iraq after we demanded Hans Blix leave and we invaded without UN approval for no other reason than WMD. Revisionist history will not change this given fact now or a hundred years from now. No Nuclear weapons development. No chemical or biological weapons since 1988 (except a few old war heads) and absolutely no link to the actual bastards that destroyed the WTC. And to throw Secretary of State Powell out there at the UN to tell those embarrassing total fabrications is a crime by itself. This is truley a blunder and a nightmare for our country and the reason that George wmd Bush is at 36% approval rating (3 full points below Nixon when he stepped out the last day of Watergate). I truly believe that this will result in return of Congressional control to those sorry Democrats and that within 18 months from now a serious impeachment effort will begin against Bush on some smoking gun they come up with on this deception. It is not good enough that he convinced the Congress to go along. Those idiots voted for the Gulf of Tonkin and that was a total lie.

[baystaterebel]

"The only thing wrong with this report is that there were no wmd in Iraq after we demanded Hans Blix leave and we invaded without UN approval for no other reason than WMD."

Did not need to read further. Your wrong from the beginning.

[Hayzo]

I refuse to have a troll like you get the last post in on this thread. Your 'revisionist history' trumps fact in your own little world. After all, Saddam was a 'model' dictator who would never conceive of any evil against the United States or any of his neighbors. Is that correct Mr. Moonbat?

[okie01]

The only thing wrong with this report is that there were no wmd in Iraq after we demanded Hans Blix leave and we invaded without UN approval for no other reason than WMD.

Obviously, then, you weren't paying much attention from October, 2002 until March, 2003.

The Iraqi war resolution -- which enjoyed b>bi-partisan support cites 23 reasons for going to war. Only three of them concern WMD.

[EasySt]

Viking Kitty attacks troll!

[ravingnutter]

Hey troll, educate yourself:

W-M-D...Documents FOUND: Will the MEDIA Rush to PRINT?

On that same thread (post #19):

Links between Iraq and Al Qaeda

Now go back to DU like a good boy and tell your friends the bad news.

[ravingnutter]

Make sure you have plenty of tissues for your tears:

N.Y. Times: Iraq Had WMD 'Stockpiles' in 2003

[ravingnutter]

"So, when the Clinton administration wants to justify its strike on al Shifa," this official tells me, "it's okay to use an Iraq-al Qaeda connection. But now that the Bush administration and George Tenet talk about links, it's suddenly not believable?"

Weekly Standard

More at the link, including verification of the links by Bill Richardson, Joe Lieberman and Evan Bayh.