Doesn't match your hyperbole, not even close.
Ah, so now that my basic point has been established as truth, it's my choice of words that offends you. Too bad, the truth hurts.
You'd have no problem seeing this as the anti-semitic initiative it is if it were ISM or Amnesty International making that demand.
Rice presses for Israel to allow free passage of "cargo" (otherwise known as weapons for terrorists)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1515359/posts
Rice presses for Israel to reopen roads to Palis immediately after a terror attack
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1505431/posts
Great summary of Rice's Arabism (from Powerline and others)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1486196/posts
The pattern is well-established by now, so I have no reservations about calling a spade a spade. This administration doesn't get the (lame, insufficient) excuse that it's merely following a decades-old US policy, because none of the previous policymakers lived in a post-9/11 world - her predecessors at least had the excuse of ignorance. Rice is actively advocating for the interests of (the world's most virulent and barbaric) terrorists in a post 9/11 world. But oddly enough it is *only* in Israel where this demand is made. No similar demand for Iraq to allow people to cross from Syria and Iran; no similar demand on Sri Lanka, the Philippines, France, or Russia or any other nation.
On its face Rice is pursuing a very antisemitic policy, and given the appearance and the history the burden is on those who say it is not to give a substantial reason why it is not.