Your kid and my kid are just as "special" as these kids, yet we can't get custom-tailored programs to help our kids reach their potential. Why not?
Another question: If you had an extra $100,000 to spend on educating a kid, who would you choose to spend it on, a bright kid who might cure cancer someday, or a kid who will be lucky if he ever learns to tie his shoes? (Before you flame me, I am NOT saying that slow kids should not be educated or should be warehoused or ignored, just that we need to have a little common sense in the distribution of our assets.)
We need to examine our priorities in this country. The public education system would be a good place to start.
We need to examine our priorities in this country. The public education system would be a good place to start
We need to free the "free" public schools. I'd guess my district here in Texas spends around $100 on "special" children for every $1 it spends on gifted children. I used to have the numbers at hand but that is the impression I got.
As long as attendance and property taxes are compulsory, then choice MUST be a component of the government school system for it to be effective.
I think if we started calling them "government schools" instead of public schools we might begin to pry some tax dollars from them, not to mention loyalty.
PS - If Southern Baptists started private schools instead of home schooling so much, they might find a unified voice to challenge the government school stranglehold. Ditto for other Proetestant denominations.