LOL! I guess you didn't read my other posts. You picked out one thing I said -- not the first thing -- and now you make it like it is some sort of foundation for an argument. It's your argument. I just made a passing comment, one of many. And I've proven that my comment was not off-base.
Actually, you haven't. You've used a comment made in an NEA report studying an alternative method of funding that is currently being used only in Europe and some large urban districts in an attempt to prove that this alternative system of funding is causing schools to fraudulently diagnose large numbers of students as "special ed" in an attempt to gain more funding.
I can't decide if it's laughable or pathetic.