I have no problem with gay marriage, and this is not an example of incrementalism.
This author is trying to make it sound as though something drastic occurred, but he is wrong.
"I have no problem with gay marriage, and this is not an example of incrementalism.
Well, it's obvious that you spit on traditional morality anyway by having "no problem" with two men or two women marrying each other, so even the theory of a slippery slope means nothing to you.
To you, it's just a walk in the park on flat ground.
To those of us who don't wear moral blinders, it is worse than a slippery slope, it's a screaming nose dive.
AG: Do you have a problem with the concept of square circles? If not, then your position on "gay" "marriage" is consistent, if nothing else.
Just curious about where you draw the line--do you have a problem if the gays are siblings?