[Quark2005]

It's also interesting how foreign science journals are more honest about printing research that might chip away at evolution.

Any specific citations? This would be more effective than an apocryphal reference. I'm all for peer-reviewed literature being used in the context of proper science education. I'm aware of none that exists supporting ID or creationism.

[Exigence]

I'm aware of none that exists supporting ID or creationism.

Ah, the old bait and switch. I was talking about evolution and criticism thereof. What are you talking about? It seems some agenda, because the focus keeps slipping.