[orionblamblam]

"Evolutionists do not want students to know about or in any way to think about scientific criticisms of evolution."

This is the most damning thing Abrams could ahve possibly said. However, it damns *himself,* as it is an astonishingly blatant LIE.

"Evolutionists" are *constantly* publicizing scientific criticisms of various aspects of evolution. And if some good science came along that criticised evolution itself, that would get openly debated as well.

[hawkaw]

"Evolutionists" are *constantly* publicizing scientific criticisms of various aspects of evolution. And if some good science came along that criticised evolution itself, that would get openly debated as well.

You are exactly correct. That is how science is suppose to be and is practiced unlike what a few on this board seem to think.

[Exigence]

"Evolutionists" are *constantly* publicizing scientific criticisms of various aspects of evolution. And if some good science came along that criticised evolution itself, that would get openly debated as well.

Really? Then why did you post that no such criticisms existed here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1511195/posts?q=1&&page=251?

I quote:
There are no scientific criticisms of evolution at this point, just ID and similar religious beliefs.

Methinks you may be tripping in your own rhetoric...

[GOPPachyderm]

Based on the response to these few words, as outlined in the article, it appears that evolution is not open to criticism.