[cvq3842]

I do have a PS - maybe not the most coherent, but sometimes my passion overcomes my reasoning ability.

No one likes war, or casualties. But there are things worse than war.

Do war opponents want to put Saddam back? Or let Zarqawi have the country? When you ask the Democrats this they always act offended that you would ask them to do something other than EXPLOIT people's natural aversion to seeing our troops in harm's way and B*TCH AND MOAN rather than present real solutions.

Isn't it funny how, after threatening Bush 41 with impeachment if he exceeded the UN resolutions and "went to Baghdad," the Dems excused Clinton's dithering on Iraq by saying "Bush 41 didn't finish the job?" And isn't it curious how many of the same folks who are so darned sure that "Bush lied" are without a doubt the same ones who BELIEVED Clinton when after a mere three weeks in office got on TV and told the American people that "I tried my best, huh huh, and I can't keep my promise - I'll have to raise your taxes." Where was the outrage on the left for that?

I don't think the Bush white house is adequately getting the message out. there is something to be said for moving forward and not going on defensive by always answering criticism, but there's danger in the other extreme as well. Let's hope Bush is now on the right track.

[angcat]

You should hear the idiot I work with. He said Saddam should be put back in power and no WOT. If we get attacked again "so what". This is a drunken hick that relies on dart shooting for stimulation. Hard to comprehend this kind of thinking. But this is someone who did not give a shit about 9/11 also. Go figure.