Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All your reviews belong to Amazon.com (Patent grab triple whammy)
The Register ^ | 12th November 2005 | Andrew Orlowski

Posted on 11/14/2005 1:50:24 AM PST by nickcarraway

Get breaking Internet news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how

Amazon.com has been granted three detailed patents covering purchase circles, consumer reviews, and search results in the form of products from multiple product categories.

It's a sweeping landgrab which puts e-commerce rivals on the alert. The techniques granted to Amazon.com by the patent office are already ubiquitous on commercial and social networking web sites.

Patent 6,963,848 filed March 2, 2000 and granted November 8, covers "Methods and system of obtaining consumer reviews".

Patent 6,963,867, filed on March 31, 2003, covers "Search query processing to provide category-ranked presentation of search results".

Patent 6,963,850, filed on August 19, 1999 covers "Computer services for assisting users in locating and evaluating items in an electronic catalog based on actions performed by members of specific user communities".

Communities may be "based on user hobbies, localities, professions, and organizations," for example. "The system automatically identifies and generates lists of the most popular items (and/or items that are becoming popular) within particular communities, and makes such information available to users for viewing.

The patent credits Jeff Bezos, amongst others, as the inventor. But as TheoDP, Amazon-watcher and collector of patent absurdities reminds us, Bezos used to deny that he ever would patent such things.

Responding to a question by The Guardian's Stuart Jeffries in October 2002 about Amazon's notorious One Click Patent, Bezos replied"that Amazon has made numerous innovations in web commerce that have been widely copied which it didn't patent, such as virtual shopping baskets, sales rankings and customer reviews."

Now it has all the base(s) covered.

So if Web 2.0 is a rain forest, as one pundit rather painfully argues, as opposed to the "desert" of Web 1.0, we now all huddle under the umbrella of its endless green canopy of patents.

Or something like that.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: amazon; patent; patentabuse; patentreform

1 posted on 11/14/2005 1:50:25 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Big deal. They put the work into making it, it's their right to patent it.

Besides, there's more than one way to skin the canonical cat when it comes to software and interfaces. This isn't the least bit bothersome to the truly inventive.

2 posted on 11/14/2005 1:53:58 AM PST by Prime Choice (Never excuse treason as "dissent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Besides, there's more than one way to skin the canonical cat when it comes to software and interfaces. This isn't the least bit bothersome to the truly inventive.

The problem is that they may ver well try to claim that, rather than being granted a patent for their specific method for obtaining consumer reviews, that they have patented consumer reviews in practically any recognizable form and will litigate anyone else who has a similar feature. The fear is also that people will begin to patent the mundane: buttons, dialog boxes, etc. and sue anyone else who dares to use them. If all Amazon is truly patenting their implementation, then that does not bug me. If they are trying to patent a widespread and rather common idea (customer reviews), then that is absurd. We'll see how it plays out.

3 posted on 11/14/2005 2:00:53 AM PST by Señor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

The real problem is the patent office.

They shouldn't issue patents on many of these things.


4 posted on 11/14/2005 2:28:42 AM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DB

Exactly. The patent office is totally out of control, and hasn't a clue on much of this sort of thing.


5 posted on 11/14/2005 3:38:25 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Señor Zorro

Amazon violates the privacy of reviewers after promising them anonymity.


6 posted on 11/14/2005 4:57:32 AM PST by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

For the most part, I like everything about Amazon and order from them when I need something.


7 posted on 11/14/2005 5:06:58 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

FWIW you have to take many of these reviews with a grain of salt. I suspect 5 star reviews out number the others.


8 posted on 11/14/2005 5:08:33 AM PST by gbaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
The real problem is the patent office. They shouldn't issue patents on many of these things.

I'm inclined to agree on principle. It seems that one need not necessarily have anything beyond a nebulous concept and enough support staff & money to endure the entire patent application process to obtain the much-coveted patent.

9 posted on 11/14/2005 6:31:49 AM PST by Prime Choice (Never excuse treason as "dissent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Señor Zorro
Agreed on your observations and commentary. If this is truly a nebulous grab-all, then the patent office really needs a solid review of its guiding policies and practices.
10 posted on 11/14/2005 6:33:47 AM PST by Prime Choice (Never excuse treason as "dissent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson