To: sagar
Evolution is not faith based. It is the basis for modern biology. Creationism, on the other hand, involves the supernatural and requires a tremendous amount of faith on the ancient scriptures.
Evolution refers to man's body.............. Creation refers to man's soul.
Is it possible both sides are right ?
245 posted on
11/13/2005 7:20:18 PM PST by
oldbrowser
(A living, breathing constitution is a usurpation of the people's sovereignty.)
To: oldbrowser
Is it possible both sides are right ?
It's possible that divine intervention was involved in the evolution of humans or in the bestowing of a "soul", however neither explanation is scientific in nature (because it attempts to address supernatural events) and neither should be presented as such.
247 posted on
11/13/2005 7:21:19 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: oldbrowser
Evolution refers to man's body.............. Creation refers to man's soul. Is it possible both sides are right ? If creation only referred to man's soul, then, yes, it is possible. But, there is absolutely no evidence for it not there ever will be. We are talking about supernatural here. Cannot substantiate it either way.
So, it does not belong in a science class. I think the whole point of the opponents of intelligent design is that supernatural stuff do not belong in a science class. It doesn't matter if 80% of Americans believe in it. It wouldn't matter if 100% believe in it. It simply does not involve science.
333 posted on
11/13/2005 11:31:20 PM PST by
sagar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson