To: Paul Ross
You are aware that Antony Flew still accepts the theory of evolution, right?
Moreover, "probability" is not positive evidence for design. Appealing to probability is to fall to the fallacy of argument form incredulity.
221 posted on
11/13/2005 6:59:54 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
"probability" is not positive evidence for design. It's evidence in its own right. Positively. Your saying nay, trying to belatedly move the goal posts of what constitutes evidence, doesn't make it so. And even if that were allowed, you must concede then It's highly probable, however. And as for for Flew, he said what he said, and he conceded. Time for you to accept the probability argument as he did.
231 posted on
11/13/2005 7:06:41 PM PST by
Paul Ross
("The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the govt and I'm here to help)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson