[Dimensio]

The author has logic, rather than blind faith to the unproved evolution theory.

Why do you say "unproved" as though that has any significance?

ALL theories in science are "unproved". Theories in science can never be proven. When you use "unproved" as a qualifier when speaking of the theory of evolution it makes it sound like either you don't understand how science works or you're being deliberately deceptive with your wording.

And an anecdote does not give me any information on the numbers of biologists who no longer accept the theory of evolution. There have always been scientists who claimed to be skeptical of the theory of evolution. You made a claim that implied that the percentage of scientists who no longer accept evolution is increasing lately.

[Sun]

You come off as being a bit disingenuous. First you tell me that you don't know of scientists who are skeptical of evolution, and when I show you 700 skeptics, you say there have always been skeptics. If you do a search, you will find even more links of skeptical scientists.

If students spent their time studying every UNPROVED theory, there would not be enough time for the 3 R's. As a matter of fact, there is NOT enough time for the 3 R's.

Junk science, sex education, PC nonsense.......

Now back to ID logic:

DNA AND CELLS - 1
The DNA Molecule - This astounding little package contains so much!
Mathematical Possibilities - Calculations reveal the utter impossibility that DNA could form by chance
DNA AND CELLS - 2
Five Biological Materials - It would also be impossible for proteins, sugars, and fats to accidentally form
Additional Math Impossibilities - Still more insurmountable problems
Just to wet the appetite. For more info, visit: http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/08dna02.htm