Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LogicWings
Nothing can prove ID correct.

Or incorrect, for that matter. That's the whole problem with it.

149 posted on 11/13/2005 5:53:02 PM PST by Quark2005 (Science aims to elucidate. Pseudoscience aims to obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: Quark2005
Or incorrect, for that matter.

I am getting tired of this. I don't have to prove it wrong, you have to prove it exists, before I have to prove it wrong.

Prove Unicorn Farts make rainbows before I have to prove they don't. Do you get it?

Prove elephants raping girls create BIGFOOT creatures before I have to prove that BIGFOOT doesn't exist.

Prove Leprechauns steal 4 leaf clovers which is why there are so few before proving that wishing on a 4 leaf clover will answer your dreams.

Do you get it yet?

165 posted on 11/13/2005 6:03:43 PM PST by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: Quark2005
Or incorrect, for that matter. That's the whole problem with it.

I agree with you. But these ninnies continually harp on the "proof" thing. I keep asking for one single piece of evidence that justifies ID. Just one. They have none.

They can scream about fossils all they want but fossils support the ToE. There is nothing comparable for ID. Nothing. I'm just goading them. ID cannot be validated or refuted, by definition.

It isn't like science could ever support ID. There is one of those old lines: "It isn't even true enough to be wrong."

200 posted on 11/13/2005 6:40:32 PM PST by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson