Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeniVidiVici

Oh, it's not going to help.

The question is whether it then lowers the costs that get billed to the state for health care for those workers when they show up at the hospital anyway. Either we pay through our income taxes, or the companies that choose not to insure their workers carry the cost.


9 posted on 11/13/2005 10:17:18 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: HostileTerritory

Since companies in Mass do not belong to the state but to their shareholders this 7% tax will adversely affect their bottomline.

So the only question is whether or not the people of Mass will shoulder the burden of this 7% tax in higher fees for goods and services or whether this will increase unemployment by businesss laying off the number of people required to cover the cost of the new tax.

Either way the taxpayers of the state will be paying for the healthcare of these workers.


10 posted on 11/13/2005 10:43:59 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson