So we'll be seeing some papers any day now, will we?
Uh, oh. The official dogma apparently can’t compete in the marketplace of ideas. If Darwinism can’t stand the scrutiny of scientific inquiry and universities have to resort to censorship to protect it, how long can it survive? Will natural selection eliminate it?
where there is obvious design, there must be, just as obviously, a designer
. Evolutionist Martin Moe correctly commented that “a century of sensational discoveries in the biological sciences has taught us that life arises only from life” (1981, 89[11]:36 ). Even the eminent evolutionist George Gaylord Simpson and his colleagues observed that “there is no serious doubt that biogenesis is the rule, that life comes only from other life, that a cell, the unit of life, is always and exclusively the product or offspring of another cell” (1965, p. 144 ). Yet with almost the same breath, these same teachers and professors tell their students that nonliving chemicals produced living organisms some time in the distant past—that is, spontaneous generation occurred.
Moe, Martin (1981), “Genes on Ice,” Science Digest, 89[11]:36,95, December.
Simpson, G.G., C.S. Pittendrigh, and L.H. Tiffany (1965), Life: An Introduction to Biology (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World).
"So we'll be seeing some papers any day now, will we?"
Not when the peers who review them for publication are doing things like prohibiting all mention of ID.