Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CondorFlight
New ideas are always met at first with ridicule; then with vehement opposition; afterwards, they are seen to have been obvious.

This is true for a tiny fraction of new ideas. Most deserve the ridicule that's heaped upon them at the outset. It's a winnowing process that I wouldn't change, even if I could.

19 posted on 11/13/2005 7:25:34 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham
Scientific theories are usually incomplete or inaccurate.

I am pretty sure that Kurt Godel proved that any self-referencing logical system (including scientific theories about the universe) is either incomplete or inaccurate. In other words, one can't use words, or any other system of symbols to describe the unknowable parts.

My problem with the intelligent design crowd is that they are not giving God enough credit. They think that just because they can't understand how He did it, He couldn't have done it the way he says He did in the first few verses of Genisis.

21 posted on 11/13/2005 7:34:54 AM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson