Behe, Demski, Meyer and others have all stated unequivocably that their work is not faith-based. They have never made claims that God was the "designer."
Please do not represent ID as being "faith-based," and we can all get along in a calmer atmosphere.
I've been getting along in a calmer atmosphere just fine. For some reason, people want to argue with me when I don't want to.
Please do not represent ID as being "faith-based," and we can all get along in a calmer atmosphere.
Of course. If everyone would just stop exposing the flaws, deceptions and misreprentations of ID, things would be so much more peaceful.
The testimony during the Dover trial was to the contrary:
"Intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory," William Dembski, one of the movement's chief proponents, said in a 1999 interview in Touchstone, a Christian magazine that Forrest cited in her testimony.[emphasis added] source: http://ydr.com/story/doverbiology/88606/