[generationfixit]

"Dean says that there was evidence removed from the intelligence given to the Congress."

Again the Dems are proving my point. They have nothing. They sound like a teenager that has no clue. They did not get "ALL" the eveidence? But what was there was enough right? That can't be playing well with the public...I mean the public would thing that the president had even more reasons not information that would disqualify what the Dems said they have....besides they can't square this argument when they are on record saying Saddam was a threat since 1998. Remember all the town meeting the Dems had in the 90's on why they had to go to war with Iraq?

[MNJohnnie]

Again the Dems are proving my point. They have nothing

Why did ever one of those Senate Dems support Bill Clinton's 1998 Iraq Bombing Campaign based on the SAME WMD intelligence Denier?

[anita]

1,100 Lawyers Leave Saddam Defense Team so says AP.

May be they realised that the democrats here will fight for Saddam's release.

[MNJohnnie]

Dean says that there was evidence removed from the intelligence given to the Congress

Remember this is the same Dr Demnto Dean who suggest Bush "knew abotu 9-11". This guy has GOT to be Rove in a mask. There is NO way the Dems are this stupid.