My observations suggest that you are wrong about Kilmeade. We know the contemporary news culture is woven by a common blindfold obstructing any useful view of reality. Thus, Kilmeade’s ability to visualize the real world places him in a category closer to genius. Let’s compare various news personalities. Upon which whom, between Kilmeade and Rather, does the name “Idiot” fall?
E. D. Hill appears to be equally smart and courageous. She’s not hard to look at either.
For your comparison, that's an accurate description of Kilmeade. Also, for this discussion, Kilmeade is a maverick....in a media where the portrayal of reality, truth and honesty is almost completely absent.
I'm just so sick of Kilmeade's preening. If I hear him comment one more time about his shirt, or his tie, or his hair, I think I'll retch. And all the little asides and quips about "gayness" and man bags are just too much to take in the morning.
I agree that there are occasional flashes of conservatism that show through, but they are so rare that it's hardly worth waiting for.
A real man doesn't talk about his clothes and grooming all the time -- he just looks terrific and pretends that he got that way naturally.
None of them can hold a candle to Judge Napolitano. A good show would be hosted by the Judge and Michelle Malkin. Now, that would be worth watching.