I wouldn't think so....and IF there is anything in there that shows Hillary in a negative light...it it very much the business of every American...
This is what Rather/Mapes was trying to do IN REVERSE to Bush...lying, and forging papers to make him look BAD...
Sounds like the courts are trying to facilitate a cover-up to help Hillary NOT look bad. I wonder if one of the judges had been audited...or something...
I can understand blocking out such things like a social security number or things like that ... because that would fall under the category of private
But to block out a name of who conducted the audits ... is not private
And looks like a cover up by the courts to reshape an outcome of an election