Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Asked whether Iraq had moved "any of his programs underground into these hardened facilities," Cohen responded that he didn't know whether Saddam had "moved these chemicals or biological agents and materials --- not only the agents themselves, but documentation .... So we don't know whether they've moved them into hardened shelters or underground bunkers." He spoke of Iraqi weapons as fact, not a probability or likelihood.


15 posted on 11/12/2005 9:34:21 AM PST by doug from upland ("Susan Estrich...get off your kneepads" - Juanita Broaddrick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland

What kills me is that the liberals have very successfully focused all the attention on nuclear weapons and the "fact" that Saddam didn't have any. They have convinced the American people that WMD = nukes. We didn't find a shitload of nuclear-tipped missiles sitting around Iraq, therefore Bush Lied. Nobody is talking anymore about the bioweapons and the chemical weapons, which WERE found in abundance after the invasion and which could have killed many more people than a couple of nukes. Nobody is talking about how the Coalition forces were expecting to have chemical weapons used against them. Nobody is talking about the possibility that Iraq was behind the anthrax attacks, which have never been solved.


17 posted on 11/12/2005 9:45:54 AM PST by Dems_R_Losers (The Kerry/Lehane/Wilson/Grunwald/Cooper plot to destroy Karl Rove has failed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson