[Constitutionalist Conservative]

You're making an argument here than the one I objected to (i.e. your IMO incorrect invocation of the 1st Amendment). My clarification of Batrachian's argument was given in that context.

The fact of the demographic shift of the past 45 years is IMO an argument against compulsory tax-supported schools. In an attempt to respect everyone's values, they end up respecting nobody's values.

[trashcanbred]

The fact of the demographic shift of the past 45 years is IMO an argument against compulsory tax-supported schools. In an attempt to respect everyone's values, they end up respecting nobody's values.

Well if you are against compulsory tax-supported schools then why would you be for teaching the bible in them(or am I making a presumption?).