Replies

Uh I ain't the one on this thread saying "darwin doesn't matter about the origins of life", ala, the liberal democrats mantra of "sex doesn't matter when it is done in the Oval Office".

Another non-seqitur, this time with a dishonest analogy to a Clinton lie that no one here has endorsed. You've demonstrated that you don't care about honesty or rationality. You've decided that you want to trash the theory of evolution and now that it's clear that no one is going to accept your ridiculous claims about what evolution supposedly implies you've changed the subject to calling anyone who accepts the theory of evolution Clinton-lovers. You can't win on merit so you just try to trash the competition. You're a shameless liar and nothing that you can say can be trusted.

Evolution does not address the ultimate origin of life. You keep insisting otherwise, but you have utterly failed to make anything remotely resembling a case for your claim. Instead, you attack anyone who points out that your assertions regarding the theory are wrong. I know why this is: creationists never admit their mistakes; they just erect a wall of lies and distractions to hide from them. Kind of like Democrats.

Another non-seqitur, this time with a dishonest analogy to a Clinton lie that no one here has endorsed. You've demonstrated that you don't care about honesty or rationality. You've decided that you want to trash the theory of evolution and now that it's clear that no one is going to accept your ridiculous claims about what evolution supposedly implies you've changed the subject to calling anyone who accepts the theory of evolution Clinton-lovers

What is so dishonest about the clinton analogy?

On this thread many people have been saying "darwin' theory had nothing to do with the origin of life".

Ala the democrats excuse of "sex in the Oval office has nothing to do with clinton".

don't blame me for your deficient persuasion skills.

Is this a clue about Dane's motivation? All he has to do is remain "unpersuaded", and he wins. Dane is better than we are, because we have "deficient persuasion skills".

It's a pretty cheap victory, coming as a result of changing the subject to something irrelevant.