The bottom line is that evolution is a theory with alot of physical evidence that both shows promise but in the end always fails to fill the gaps. ID is a theory not exclusive to evolution.
All we need is for schools, scientists etc. to briefly acknowledge that evolution is a theory (not 100% proven fact which it is not) with a testing of the physical while ID is the testing of the spiritual. Both are theories.
In regards to this article it is both ridiculous and dishonest to portray ID supporters as people who want no physical sciences taught and just want all science classes replaced with "theology." I have heard no such proposal so the whole premise of this article is specious to say the least.
Only because they haven't found anything in chemistry classes (for instance) that offends their biblical view of the world. They are quite happy to inject miracles and supernatural forces and influences into biology class. When you start saying 'some unknown guiding hand caused the changes in Eohippus, using some completely unknown mechanism', that's not science, that's mysticism.
Whave you read about the Wedge Project?