Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
Wonderful stuff...on so many levels. I can't read most of it without becoming furious all over again. Two things makes me very happy about Clinton. The first is that the blue dress finally proved him to be a liar so all could it see. The second is the much deserved impeachement. My only regret is that he was not convicted and removed from office. In any case, his only legacy is Monica and impeachment. No matter how much this slime ball whines, he can never put humpty dumpty together again. And as noted, history will dim memory of the Internet bubble which alone accounted for the economic boom during his presidency and he had nothing to do with it. Thanks again Mia T. Great work.
49 posted on 11/19/2005 5:02:23 PM PST by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cautor

Thanks.

I think clinton's ultimate legacy will be the decisions he made.

When he decided not to go after bin Laden, when he decided to pass out our weapons technology like candy, he did these things for his own aggrandizement.

In other words, to enhance his legacy, bill clinton endangered America, endangered Western civilization and endangered the world.

How ironic.

How despicable.

How dumb.
And the Left still thinks this defective is brilliant.
What does that say about the Left?

 
I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

COMPLETE ARTICLE


51 posted on 11/19/2005 6:00:08 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson