Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deo volente

Watching Fox -- they just had Arnaud de Borchgrave on, who said the ideological battle between Islam and the West will go on for decades. Hmm, he's saying Bush didn't answer the question of whether bin Laden was behind 9/11. At one time we thought Saddam was behind the attacks.


487 posted on 11/11/2005 9:38:59 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]


To: hershey

Saddam was a fat, lazy dictator who was willing to support and use anyone who would do his dirty work for him. Bin Laden's hatred was a useful too to him. Saddam's support was a usetool tool for bin Laden. They used each other.


558 posted on 11/11/2005 9:49:21 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]

To: hershey
"Bush didn't answer the question of whether bin Laden was behind 9/11. At one time we thought Saddam was behind the attacks."

Bin Laden has already taken credit for the 9/11 attacks and admitted so in one of his earlier videos. I can recall no one in this Administration ever claiming Iraq was involved either in the 9/11 attack or in its planning.

781 posted on 11/11/2005 11:25:57 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson