Their claim is not that the documents are accurate, they more or less concede that they are fake.
They claim that the underlying story the documents were intended to "prove" is true, which is, by definition, a leap of faith.
I wonder if they would have the same degree of understanding for a cop who fakes evidence to convict someone he "knows" is guilty?
>>>>I wonder if they would have the same degree of understanding for a cop who fakes evidence to convict someone he "knows" is guilty?<<<<<
Clearly, that would depend on who the 'someone' is...
They certainly would, if that someone were a Republican or a conservative.