Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tempest
The periodic table.

When was the periodic table "theory"? Be specific.

I've explained multiple times now.

No, you haven't. You've repeatedly asserted without providing a single explanation. You haven't given any details as to exactly how the voters "rejected the Lord". The only thing that you've said is that they voted out the previous school board members and somehow "rejected creation", but you provided no link between the vote and a rejection of creation given that the vote had nothing whatsoever to do with creationism.
322 posted on 11/13/2005 1:06:59 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
When was the periodic table "theory"? Be specific.

That's an interesting question.The Table gave rise to hypotheses that "missing" elements would be found with expected characteristics, and to some extent this happened.

However the Table itself was never explanatory, and there's a whole section that went kablooy in terms of expectations.

It's interesting that someone would consider the Table a theory or a fact.

323 posted on 11/13/2005 1:23:51 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio

During it's formation classifications and distinguishing of elements had to be determined.

I have explained you're just either very dense or fisihing for a specific response to prattle on with one of your canned responses.


329 posted on 11/13/2005 10:28:20 PM PST by Tempest (I'm a Christian. Before I am a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson