To: Tempest
The periodic table.
When was the periodic table "theory"? Be specific.
I've explained multiple times now.
No, you haven't. You've repeatedly asserted without providing a single explanation. You haven't given any details as to exactly how the voters "rejected the Lord". The only thing that you've said is that they voted out the previous school board members and somehow "rejected creation", but you provided no link between the vote and a rejection of creation given that the vote had nothing whatsoever to do with creationism.
322 posted on
11/13/2005 1:06:59 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
When was the periodic table "theory"? Be specific. That's an interesting question.The Table gave rise to hypotheses that "missing" elements would be found with expected characteristics, and to some extent this happened.
However the Table itself was never explanatory, and there's a whole section that went kablooy in terms of expectations.
It's interesting that someone would consider the Table a theory or a fact.
323 posted on
11/13/2005 1:23:51 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: Dimensio
During it's formation classifications and distinguishing of elements had to be determined.
I have explained you're just either very dense or fisihing for a specific response to prattle on with one of your canned responses.
329 posted on
11/13/2005 10:28:20 PM PST by
Tempest
(I'm a Christian. Before I am a conservative.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson