Skip to comments.
Traditional marriage under fire: Who's really to blame?
The Houston Chronicle ^
| November 10, 2005
| Daniel Allott
Posted on 11/10/2005 12:28:27 PM PST by Wolf13
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: xsmommy
41
posted on
11/10/2005 1:33:50 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: Wolf13
Medved is talking to the GLSN Right to Marry activist right now. They are making a strong push back against these states outlawing gay marriage.
42
posted on
11/10/2005 1:36:05 PM PST
by
hattend
(In France, it's not just the cheese that's soft and runny.)
To: Khankrumthebulgar
Men are insane to marry in this culture as they have zero reproductive rights, zero rights to Visitation in Divorce, and only liabilities. Spoken like a man who knows absolutely nothing about marriage. You should really pose these theories to a man who's been happily married for a decade or more. As one myself, I can only say that it's a sad misunderstanding of marriage you have.
43
posted on
11/10/2005 1:36:50 PM PST
by
Melas
(What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
To: xsmommy
well for one thing, don't hook up with someone in vegas and go to an allnight wedding chapel, know who you are marrying so as to avoid a DREADFUL BRIDE ; ) (being as you live there) Yah - getting married by Elvis isn't usually a good start... ;)
44
posted on
11/10/2005 1:40:03 PM PST
by
blaise
To: HitmanNY
Now that was spoken like a guy who has a clue. You hit just about every nail that time. Nothing can ram home the sancity of marriage like a failed one. I know, it happened to me in a marriage that started to fall apart almost immediately after the I do's. As a result, I was infinitely more careful before asking my 2nd and current wife to marry me. Unlike the first time out, this one has endured, and grown over the years. I couldn't be happier.
45
posted on
11/10/2005 1:41:26 PM PST
by
Melas
(What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
To: hattend
Medved is talking to the GLSN Right to Marry activist right now. They are making a strong push back against these states outlawing gay marriage. Wonder if they'd have the guts to outlaw divorce...
46
posted on
11/10/2005 1:42:06 PM PST
by
blaise
To: Wolf13
To: xsmommy
I agree 100%. I'm sorry to hear you went to law school though. :-)
PS - I'm a lawyer who doesn't practice anymore, so its a lawyer on lawyer joke, nothing more! ;-)
48
posted on
11/10/2005 1:43:35 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: xsmommy
I agree 100%. I'm sorry to hear you went to law school though. :-)
PS - I'm a lawyer who doesn't practice anymore, so its a lawyer on lawyer joke, nothing more! ;-)
49
posted on
11/10/2005 1:43:46 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: blaise
50
posted on
11/10/2005 1:44:23 PM PST
by
hattend
(In France, it's not just the cheese that's soft and runny.)
To: xsmommy
Marrying the wrong person is grounds enough for divorce. When someone says they want to stop no-fault divorce, I imagine the years and years of hell I'd have lived, and still have ahead of me if I were shackled to my first wife. Provided I didn't take the easy way out and just blow my brains out to escape. Divorce is the best thing that ever happened to me. If it weren't for divorce, I'd have never been able to undo that near-tragic error in judgement. I'd have never met the love of my life. I wouldn't have beautiful children. I would just be in hell.
51
posted on
11/10/2005 1:44:52 PM PST
by
Melas
(What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
To: Melas
Thanks. I like to think I usually have a clue, though people in my life insist I misplace it all the time! ;-)
I am glad things worked out for you the second time, amigo.
52
posted on
11/10/2005 1:45:45 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: xsmommy
then people would think long and hard before entering into the marriage contract. Wrong. Young people would still be stupid. The notion that the young and invincible (in their own minds) would show maturity beyond their years is just poppycock.
53
posted on
11/10/2005 1:47:43 PM PST
by
Melas
(What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
To: DA740
"The only way to preserve marriage and family is to remove it from the purview of female influence. "
Well, good luck with that. I'm pretty sure I can speak for every female I know, and we're not going back to arranged marriages, no matter how hard you wish upon a star. *Snort*
54
posted on
11/10/2005 1:50:00 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: DA740
Wow. That's remarkably off base.
55
posted on
11/10/2005 1:51:31 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
To: Wolf13
Welcome to FR, BTW. You don't happen to be advocating Gay Marriage and signed up today to take some quotes back to DU, did you?
Just checking. :)
56
posted on
11/10/2005 1:52:35 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: hattend
Medved is ripping this GLTF guy's debate/premise to pieces.
57
posted on
11/10/2005 1:55:14 PM PST
by
hattend
(In France, it's not just the cheese that's soft and runny.)
To: DA740
Isn't the opposite in some ways? The views most women have held about marriage etc. have dissolved to a large degree, and that has had a huge impact on society.
58
posted on
11/10/2005 1:57:10 PM PST
by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: Wolf13
Marriage is allowed and sustained for rich folks. I say that as one who is far more socially conservative than most of you. Allow families to survive (without the huge number of social programs that smack families down for the divorce/cohabitation industry), and families will help your economy. Break them to keep them in slavery, and you'll lose.
59
posted on
11/10/2005 1:57:36 PM PST
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: DA740
Females had quite a say about it - witness even medieval ["patriarchal" if there ever were ones] laws about female title to dowries and inheritances.
60
posted on
11/10/2005 1:58:30 PM PST
by
GSlob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson