Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skeptoid
Back when Alaska chose to become a state, the Federal Government promised to turn over all the land not in use for such things as military bases and National Parks to the new State. They lied. Even the Native Corporations had to sue to get the land they now own--- with Federal strings attached. Even much of the land that was under the jurisdiction of the BLM has now been made into new National Parks, thus eliminating any chance the State might have to claim it. This has cost the State Billions of dollars and countless jobs.
Guess what? Now that self-same Federal Government (that's you, me and a bunch of others who pay taxes) has its panties in a wad cause some of those upstart Alaskans want part of their money back. Had the land been transferred to State control as was promised, the City of Ketchikan could build a bridge to Gravina Island and then on to Wrangell and Juneau plus drill a tunnel through the nountains to the Alcan Highway!
Until you know what you're talking (typing) about it might be wise to do a bit of research.
16 posted on 11/10/2005 12:56:28 PM PST by oldfart ("All governments and all civilizations fall... eventually. Our government is not immune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: oldfart
Back when Alaska chose to become a state, the Federal Government promised to turn over all the land not in use for such things as military bases and National Parks to the new State. They lied. Even the Native Corporations had to sue to get the land they now own--- with Federal strings attached. Even much of the land that was under the jurisdiction of the BLM has now been made into new National Parks, thus eliminating any chance the State might have to claim it. This has cost the State Billions of dollars and countless jobs. Guess what? Now that self-same Federal Government (that's you, me and a bunch of others who pay taxes) has its panties in a wad cause some of those upstart Alaskans want part of their money back. Had the land been transferred to State control as was promised, the City of Ketchikan could build a bridge to Gravina Island and then on to Wrangell and Juneau plus drill a tunnel through the nountains to the Alcan Highway! Until you know what you're talking (typing) about it might be wise to do a bit of research.

Well done, sir...well, done!

26 posted on 11/10/2005 8:53:44 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: oldfart

So what you are saying is that this bridge has to be Federal because the area is under Federal control?


29 posted on 11/10/2005 8:59:47 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: oldfart
....."Ketchikan could build a bridge to Gravina Island and then on to Wrangell"

Hey, oldfart, (your choice of name) look at a chart. You are the ignorant one here. A road link from Gravina Island to Wrangell (on another island, BTW), would require about a SIX MILE BRIDGE CROSSING of impossibly deep salt water subject to several storms each year. It is beyond the capability of humankind. It exists only in your imagination.

On the other hand, a road link from Ketchikan to the north end of Revilla Island and roughly along the hydroelectric intertie route involves two feasable crossings and comes within reasonable distance of existing Alaskan logging roads and Canadian mining roads and involves the least pioneering.

Check it out and let me know, "oldfart".

32 posted on 11/10/2005 10:16:24 PM PST by skeptoid (lysdexia: the dyslexic's "dyslexia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson