Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I wonder how much fuel the aircraft had left onboard.Was it enough to soak a large sponge?
4 posted on 11/10/2005 7:29:43 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

Yeah, did they use the CENTER fuel tank? Plus a little assist from the Jet Stream I expect...


15 posted on 11/10/2005 7:55:15 AM PST by GRRRRR (America is a better place because of people like us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

I wonder if they had legal IFR reserves.


38 posted on 11/10/2005 9:12:38 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
The Seattle P. I. says they had lots left>

"The plane had 360,732 pounds of fuel before the engines were started in Hong Kong -- more than the combined weight of the plane, its passengers and their bags. When it landed in London it had 18,700 pounds of fuel remaining."

It also says:
"The plane actually flew farther than the 13,422 miles that went into the record book. That's because the distance record is measured by a straight line from the start to each of the three turn points and finally to the end point at Heathrow. But the plane did not fly in a straight line between those points. The pilots would sometimes change course slightly to find better winds, although each of the three turn points had to be overflown. A flight map that is part of the jet's in-flight entertainment system showed the total miles flown just before landing at 14,042 miles."

49 posted on 11/11/2005 12:23:19 AM PST by skeptoid (lysdexia: the dyslexic's "dyslexia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson