LOL! Read your own posts to me, then get back to me with your apology.
As for the "content" of your post ... well, it would be a stretch to call it that. For example, back to the very root of our disagreement:
You clearly don't have any understanding of the fundamentals of logic. I didn't "invent" Can't Prove a Negative, this is a standard logical fallacy. If you don't understand or accept it, it only proves your ignorance of standard scientific criteria for evidence.
ROTFLMAO!!!!! Oh, goodness ... the old "I don't have to prove it but you have to accept it or you're too stupid to understand" ploy. That, truly, takes the cake! You know, it's becoming abundantly clear that you can't prove your assertion, and you're just too prideful to admit it. I never claimed that you "invented" it, but you're claiming special knowledge about the statement.
You said: "you can't prove a negative."
Please prove the statement.
If you are either too stupid or too ignorant of logic to understand why this is true then you have violated the three fallacy rule in a single sentence.
For the final time - you cannot prove true that which does not exist and for which there is no evidence.
You can't Prove a Negative.