[RunningWolf]

There are crickets because this is a false linkage except in the mind of you guys.

When Newton observed that an apple fell to the ground on earth at 32' per/sec ² that was a direct observation that he measured, not some convoluted evolving morphing thing like your evo belief is.

You dont see a gravity cult, why?

There is no need for religion nor any ID concepts to enter the battle of ideas for cosmo-evo to be a weak description, its weak on its own. The best case against it is to take a look at it and its evidence, like I did years ago.

Wolf

[js1138]

When Newton observed that an apple fell to the ground on earth at 32' per/sec 2 that was a direct observation that he measured, not some convoluted evolving morphing thing like your evo belief is.

I think it was Galileo who measured the acceleration of gravity by direct observation.

Newton applied his equations to the universe, an object he could not possibly observe directly. It was the successful calculation of the orbit of a comet by Halley that first confirmed Newton's gravitation -- long after Newton was dead.

But don't let facts impede your ranting.