[furball4paws]

I didn't believe it possible, but it is. You are that thick.

The White Crow Fallacy is not about the existence of White Crows.

[r9etb]

The White Crow Fallacy is not about the existence of White Crows

Gasp!!! I actually understood that before you so kindly elucidated. Golly. I must not be that thick after all!

Of course, the name itself is suggestive -- it banks on the supposed scarcity of White Crows, and the related difficulty of proving that the statement of non-existence is true.

I posted the picture to make an ancillary point; namely, that there is no need to continue trying to prove the truth of a statement that has already been shown to be false.

I'm guessing that you're not too thick to understand that.

[LogicWings]

I didn't believe it possible, but it is. You are that thick. The White Crow Fallacy is not about the existence of White Crows.

I didn't believe you were so thick that I thought it was. Oh, well.

[LogicWings]

Sorry furballs. I was writing on reflex before retiring. Missed the CC to me. Guess I'm "that thick." At least my wife says so.