Hell, I'm taking cheap shots at a young man who is running the family business. (his daddy started the church) and I don't have to justify his operating expenses. I think they are sitting on his wife's finger.
Just about everyone knows that the 'young man' was selected to replace his daddy's ministry. Let's see; he was selected by whom? The congregation of the church, you say? Offended you weren't consulted first, before the decision was made? Yes, daddy started the church, but that's not what I asked you. I asked how the church came to be. And yes, of course, you aren't obliged to respond, anymore than you are obliged to justify the church's operating expenses. But, that makes your comments mere unsupported allegations, otherwise described as slander, rumor mongering, derogation, or, sometimes, calumny. And, typical of that style of discussion and debate, you close with an additional calumny.