[Just mythoughts]

"As a Christian, I have an open mind. The Genesis stories were imported into Christianity carte blanc as part of the acceptance into the entire Bible of the cononized "Old Testament". Just as science is to be scrutenized for accuracy, so should be any scriptual writings of the past.

The decendants, from "Adam", just don't add up and stupidly indicate a "New Earth" and if we want to be critical of agnostic science, we should also be just as critical of what religious "truths" we accept as fact. Just because some past generation has "canonized" writings doesn't mean search for devine truth should be aborted. "

Christ was in the Beginning = Genesis, it is Christ that Christian are supposed to be following NOT what man traditions are.

Now man's tradition are that this earth is around 6,000 years old, yet NOWHERE is that Written in the Word from Genesis to Revelations, some flesh man conjured it up.

Now Christ was the only PERFECT human being ever born of flesh woman, and it is HE that provides the evidence that evolution is a LIE.

[LogicWings]

Now Christ was the only PERFECT human being ever born of flesh woman, and it is HE that provides the evidence that evolution is a LIE.

Really, what evidence did He provide against a theory that didn't exist for another 1900 years?