Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
Wrong. It posits that existing diverse life on earth originated from common ancestry. That's it. It doesn't even lay claim to the origin of the ancestral life forms from which everything descended. It makes no claims as to the origin of anything beyond that, including manner. Evolution does not claim that matter is "eternal"

You cannot have it both ways. You say it teaches that the existing diverse life on earth originated from common ancestry. Very well. By what process, I ask? By a mechanism which no one has ever seen in action, no one can explain, for which no evidence exists, etc...?

If you propose this irrational explanation, why should I or anyone else believe what you say regarding what evolution supposedly does or doesn't say about the origin of life? Change over time is but one facet of the grand lie of evolution.

Where did the common ancestral life forms come from? Did they evolve too? From what?

219 posted on 11/10/2005 1:19:07 PM PST by music_code (Atheists can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: music_code
You say it teaches that the existing diverse life on earth originated from common ancestry. Very well. By what process, I ask? By a mechanism which no one has ever seen in action, no one can explain, for which no evidence exists, etc...?

No, by mutation coupled with selective pressures favouring certain emerging traits. Who told you that the mechanism can't be explained or has never been seen in action? Mutations and natural selection have both been observed.

If you propose this irrational explanation, why should I or anyone else believe what you say regarding what evolution supposedly does or doesn't say about the origin of life?

What is irrational about the explanation besides your assertion that it is irrational and your denial of actual observed events?

Where did the common ancestral life forms come from? Did they evolve too?

The procesess by which the original life forms emerged was not evolution, because evolution can only occur when life exists. It is an important question in biology, and research is being done in the field, but ultimately how those first life forms came to exist does not in any way affect the validity of the theory of evolution. They could have been molecules forming chains due to simple chemistry, they could have been interdimensional aliens seeding the planet, they could have been zap-poofed into existence by a divine agent or time-travelling humans from the future could have placed them and the theory of evolution does not change one bit.
223 posted on 11/10/2005 1:22:46 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson