Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnnyM

The art of reconstructing the "flesh" of skeletal remains has advanced light years in the past few decades. Nowadays, computers are fed the data and can reconstruct not only the appearance, but the stance of the individual (if hip/thigh are available).


192 posted on 11/10/2005 12:48:45 PM PST by Junior (From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
simply from a fossilized bone? Does it use DNA?

JM
193 posted on 11/10/2005 12:53:01 PM PST by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: Junior
my question is in regards to Ichy's post. It seems, and correct me if i'm wrong, that scientists and other individuals are attempting to classify a singleton fossil, such as a skull as either ape or human. Due to similarities in skeletal structure would it not make this classification much more difficult? If, however, the skull was attached to a full skeleton or, better yet, still had its flesh and musculature in tact, classification would be much easier?

JM
197 posted on 11/10/2005 12:58:17 PM PST by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson